'No firm date' on fire safety work to fix Mansfield's London apartment block

Watch more of our videos on ShotsTV.com 
and on Freeview 262 or Freely 565
Visit Shots! now
Mansfield District Council says there’s no firm date on when works will begin to address fire safety defects in a London apartment block it owns, six years after they were discovered.

The repairs on the flats on Bedford Road, Clapham, were originally estimated to cost the authority about £20m.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Residents live in the flats, and won’t be moved out for remediation work until a plan is in place.

The Labour-run authority says it doesn’t know whether the work will cost more or less than originally budgeted.

Mansfield District Council says there’s no firm date on when works will begin to address fire safety defects in a London apartment block it owns, six years after they were discovered.Mansfield District Council says there’s no firm date on when works will begin to address fire safety defects in a London apartment block it owns, six years after they were discovered.
Mansfield District Council says there’s no firm date on when works will begin to address fire safety defects in a London apartment block it owns, six years after they were discovered.

It is currently working with contractor Wilmot Dixon to develop a project plan.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Once this is agreed, the authority will apply for Building Regulation from Lambeth Council, which oversees the area where the building sits.

It was confirmed earlier this month that Mansfield Council plans to launch legal action to recover the costs of the work.

Elected Mayor Andy Abrahams (Lab) took the decision under emergency powers due to time sensitivity.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Nearly all councillors backed him at a recent full council meeting, with Councillor June Stendall (Ind) saying it was “about time” legal action was launched.

The target hasn’t been named in public reports, and the building’s developer Oakapple went into voluntary liquidation in 2017.

Serious fire issues at the Clapham building were found in 2018 by an independent assessment in the wake of the Grenfell Tower fire disaster, which led to new fire safety regulations.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The London Fire Brigade also found other issues, including the lack of 60 minutes of fire safety resistance protection for escape routes in corridors, lobbies and stairs.

Read More
Support local: Opening times for North Nottinghamshire markets, includes Mansfie...

The council previously forecast that it would spend approximately £19.691m between 2018 and 2025 to fix the issues.

This included £4.98m allocated in the 2022 to 2023 budget, with £7.296m budgeted for 2023/24 and a further £6.472m in 2024/25.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The local authority previously said it bought the property as an investment to ensure revenue while council funding was uncertain.

The building is also home to international lift engineering firm KONE, which rents business space on the ground floor.

In a statement today, a council spokesperson said: “The council doesn’t have a firm date [for when the work will start].

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“However, we are working very closely with a national contractor on a project plan to reach an agreed date.

“The arrangement we are developing with the contractor includes elements of the contractor’s design.

“Only once the design is agreed upon can Building Regulation approval be applied for.

“As such no, an application hasn’t been submitted as yet.

“The original budget was and is just that – a budget.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“We have not been able to ascertain costs up until recently when we began to work with the national contractor.

“Part of the work we are undertaking at present is project costings.”

The authority had previously applied for building control to get the works started, but this was rejected by Lambeth Council in summer 2022.

No documents were published with this application, though the Lambeth authority said at the time this was because the application didn’t outline how building regulations would be met.

Comment Guidelines

National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.