Elected mayor required to feel full benefits of devolution, Notts told

Nottinghamshire will only feel the full benefits of a potential devolution deal if the area creates an elected mayor, government papers have revealed.

Coun Ben Bradley, Nottinghamshire Council leader and Mansfield MP, admitted councils would be ‘a bit daft’ not to consider this option, but says the decision is not his alone to make.

The Government has published its Levelling Up White Paper, setting out plans for devolution.

Supporters say it will give greater spending power and more decision-making to local areas, while reducing Westminster’s control on some major regional projects.

Coun Ben Bradley, Mansfield MP and Nottinghamshire Council leader, outside County Hall, the council headquarters in West Bridgford.

However, local Labour leaders say an elected mayor idea has been rejected in Nottinghamshire before, while one council leader said he feared the plan would lead to the scrapping of district councils.

As part of the Government announcement, Nottinghamshire is among nine areas to negotiate what the Conservative-led Government is describing as new ‘county deals’.

The new project could give councils more ability to shape services like healthcare, public transport, education and skills, strategic planning and public safety.

However, the papers confirm the county will only be handed the most powers if a directly-elected, political mayor is the ‘accountable’ person to use them.

Papers show the mayoral position would need to be accompanied by a combined authority, which would only incorporate county and city councils when making decisions.

District councils, like Manfield and Ashfield, would act as ‘non-constituent members’ and have no power.

According to the White Paper, a maximum of 23 powers could be devolved from Whitehall as part of devolution, dropping to 11 without the mayoral post.

However, if local leaders opted to stay with the current system, which operates with the nine councils and a joint committee, just three new powers would be handed over, with ‘scope to negotiate’.

Read More

Read More
Proud Blidworth church celebrates 100 years of keeping baby-rocking custom alive

Options

Coun Bradley said: “The county deal option is in there, we can tick that box because we’ve got it.

“This option would be good to be able to draw down money into a local pot for us to decide what to do with it.

“Clearly the document also says, if you want significant economic clout, any extra money, you need a combined authority and mayor.

“We’d be daft not to at least have a conversation about the rest, but that’s not a decision I can make.”

When asked whether he would consider running for the mayoral role if it became available, Mr Bradley said the job would be ‘really exciting for whoever takes it on’.

However, the proposals have led to concerns from opposition leaders.

Coun Kate Foale, Nottinghamshire Council Labour group leader, said: “For years, councils have been strung along by this Conservative Government, promising local voices would be heard on devolution.

“Consistently, representatives from all political views across Nottinghamshire have rejected a mayoral system imposed by Westminster, but that is exactly the type of centralised, top-down imposition we’ve been offered.”

Coun Jason Zadrozny, Ashfield Council leader, said: “The White Paper contains 12 pledges to address 12 failures in 12 years of a Conservative Government.

“It states its aim is to devolve power, but does the opposite. Make no mistake, this is the first step to abolishing the local councils we all hold so dear.”

The Nottinghamshire economic prosperity committee, made up of leaders from all nine local councils, will meet this week to discuss it.

A message from your Chad editor, Jon Ball: Support your Chad by becoming a digital subscriber. You will see 70 per cent fewer ads on stories, meaning faster load times and an overall enhanced user experience. Click here to subscribe.