Concerns over 'controversial' Pleasley housing development in light of 'air quality' levels in Mansfield area

A resident-led action group in Pleasley has expressed concerns over a “controversial” housing development in the area in light of reports that two-thirds of Mansfield neighbourhoods are exposed to “dangerously high levels” of air pollution.

This article contains affiliate links. We may earn a small commission on items purchased through this article, but that does not affect our editorial judgement.

Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

As reported in your Chad, figures unveiled by environmental group Friends of the Earth show that more than two-thirds of Mansfield neighbourhoods are exposed to dangerously high levels of air pollution.

These figures reflect national findings, as data highlighted that across England and Wales, 36.1 million people, including eight million children, were breathing air with hazardous levels of nitrogen dioxide in 2022.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Chris Clarke, Pleasley Community Action Group (PCAG), said members read the article with “interest” and “concern.”

Pleasley Community Action Group has been speaking with residents who live near the A617 where the largest development will impact on. Brian Wheatcroft the co-coordinator spoke with resident Vicky who was pointing out the noise problems already and discussing the infrastructure impacts in the area.Pleasley Community Action Group has been speaking with residents who live near the A617 where the largest development will impact on. Brian Wheatcroft the co-coordinator spoke with resident Vicky who was pointing out the noise problems already and discussing the infrastructure impacts in the area.
Pleasley Community Action Group has been speaking with residents who live near the A617 where the largest development will impact on. Brian Wheatcroft the co-coordinator spoke with resident Vicky who was pointing out the noise problems already and discussing the infrastructure impacts in the area.

He said: “Pleasley has been known as a hot spot for some time now but planners continue to press ahead with development in the area without any regard to the impact on infrastructure such as roads and air quality.

“Our group is not against building houses in the right number but building 850 houses in a mixed development which also incorporates businesses will only bring more traffic to currently overburdened roads and will impact negatively on air quality.”

The community group has been outspoken in their “concerns” over the housing development on agricultural land at Pleasley Hill Farm.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad
Pleasley Hill Farm. Plans for 850 homes, a hotel, petrol station and businesses on land off Water Lane in Pleasley were given the green light.Pleasley Hill Farm. Plans for 850 homes, a hotel, petrol station and businesses on land off Water Lane in Pleasley were given the green light.
Pleasley Hill Farm. Plans for 850 homes, a hotel, petrol station and businesses on land off Water Lane in Pleasley were given the green light.

Planning permission was given the green light.

“If the council were serious in delivering a clean neighbourhood then they would consider such impacts seriously when they provide reports to the planning committee – including the impact on air quality if developments of this size were considered.

“We remain firm in our views that certain elements of the Pleasley Hill Farm development should not go ahead,” Chris added.

The Pleasley Hill Farm site is allocated for development in the council’s ‘adopted local plan 2013-2033’.

Read More
Air pollution levels 'dangerously high' in many Mansfield and Ashfield neighbour...
Hide Ad
Hide Ad

A Mansfield Council spokesperson said: “Planning permission was granted in June 2023 for an outline application for a mixed-use development for up to 850 houses, class E/B8 business use, hotel, petrol filling station, care home and neighbourhood retail.

“The outline application was supported by an environmental impact assessment, which included an air quality assessment.

“A report to the planning committee covered the development's dust and traffic impacts on air quality.

“Dust during the construction phase of the development was identified in the application as one of the main impacts, as well as traffic during the operational phase.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“In relation to dust, the council recommended that specific measures would be needed to ensure the potential impact on neighbouring residents is adequately mitigated.

“In relation to the impact of traffic on air quality, the off-site junction improvements will help to reduce the volumes of queuing traffic.

“Also, promoting sustainable travel through access to bus services for occupants of the development will further reduce emissions.

“The site is not located within an air management quality area and is not subject to other designations.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“It was considered that the proposals would not adversely impact air quality to a degree that would outweigh the benefits of the application.

“The lack of objection to the proposals from the environmental health officer corroborates this assessment.”

Related topics: