Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

McEwan happy with clean sheet after Stags' fourth successive home win



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
28 August 2008
MANSFIELD boss Billy McEwan was delighted to see his week's work on getting a rare clean sheet come up trumps as Stags went second in the table with a narrow 1-0 win over impressive Grays Athletic on Saturday afternoon.
"All week in training we have worked on our defending and keeping a clean sheet and it paid off," he said

"We got blocks and bodies in the way though I was angry at half time as I felt our midfield were not winning enough second balls.

"But I was delighted with the win. They made us work very hard for it and all credit to Grays. I thought they played very well - probably our toughest test this season - but we defended excellently as a team.

"We are not getting carried away - there is a long, long way to go. You can't build a house overnight and you can't build a football team overnight.

"It wasn't a classic and we have got to pass the ball better. When we did we looked dangerous and we walked through them for the penalty.

"After just six weeks together it's a decent start and I am grateful to the players - their effort has been outstanding."

The game was settled by a disputed Mark Stallard penalty on 23 minutes and McEwan added: "I felt it was a blatant penalty today. We had one at Barrow last week worse than that - it was GBH - and we didn't get it so this one evened that out."

He also explained the absence of striker Aaron O'Connor from the 16 following his two-goal haul on Bank Holiday Monday.

McEwan said: "It was part of the agreement when he came to us that he couldn't play for us when we play them.

"I have known about it all week, but wanted to keep it quiet; I thought it was better that way."

And looking ahead to Tuesday's televised match at York City, one of his former clubs, McEwan added: "I don't want the players posing about or showboating, they are not TV stars.

"It is my first time back there since I was sacked, but I hope I get a good reaction. I had a good rapport with the supporters."

He also said he was continuing his search to strengthen the squad, explaining that it would probably be through loan deals either before or after the transfer window closes at the end of the month.

Grays boss Mike Woodward disagreed with McEwan over Saturday's matchwinning spot kick and said: "I though the penalty decision was diabolical - it was ball to hand and not hand to ball. And we had a blatant penalty turned down at the other end.

"But the away team rarely gets the decision - it's like playing at Old Trafford.

"We definitely deserved something out of that game - a draw or even a win.

"We were the away side yet we took the initiative and the game to the home side and you had to listen to the home crowd getting on their players' backs.

"Any paying customer would have said Grays looked like the home side.

"You only get out what you put into games but we are not a bad side and our luck will turn."

The full article contains 570 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 30 August 2008 7:18 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Mansfield
 
Prev
1
2
1

Adamr999,

30/08/2008 19:12:29
i disagree with their manager there "penalty" claim was ball to hand and not hand to ball.
2

dot,

30/08/2008 19:39:41
so why was it better, Billy, to keep O'Connor's disappearing trick quiet? Why weren't we told in the week, rather than wondering all afternoon what the hell was happening to one of our players who we were cheering just a few days earlier.onspiracy theories were doing the rounds. I am sure Grays were aware he would not be playing afterall!!!!!!
3

delboy the Stag,

30/08/2008 20:11:47
Come on Adam,if ours was a penalty then so was theirs.We all felt that theirs was more clear cut than ours.I also agree with their Manager.They were the better side today & played some nice football.They just didnt have a Striker to finish off their good play.
Still,I`ll take 3 points,even when we are that poor.
3 more on Tues PLEASE.
4

Adamr999,

30/08/2008 20:28:05
nah no way was theirs a penalty, they probably were the better team but they didnt use that to their advantage so bad performance or not its a win 3 points joint 1st dont complain
5

Jake_stagsfan,

30/08/2008 20:55:48
30 sumet fans lol
6

Jake_stagsfan,

30/08/2008 20:56:40
and today how many balls did Somner Give away ?
7

delboy the Stag,

30/08/2008 22:09:18
Jake,I dont think we can single any 1 player out today.
It was just ONE AWFUL TEAM DISPLAY!!!!!!!!
We MUST improve,because we cant expect to win many more games like that.In fact,we could end getting battered.It`s a good job the other teams in this league are so sh*te(So far).

Come on Billy!!3 points are very nice but, We deserve better!!!!!
8

Adamr999,

30/08/2008 22:56:46
how can we get anymore than 3 points ??? wasent the best performance no did we do enough to get the points? yes are we joint top? yes this team is doing extremely well for a bunch of strangers defense is really starting to form now a few loan signings to add depth would be nice.
9

Jake_stagsfan,

30/08/2008 22:58:14
i understand what u mean delboy but Somner was c**p today and we didnt ever really look good up front until robinson had came on but i do think that we and the rest of the stags fans deserve alot better than that
10

dot,

31/08/2008 15:53:57
patience is the key - and the quality of play will improve the more they play together surely?
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.