Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Judicial review for Rainworth windfarm decision?



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 July 2008
Email Helen Lambourne

CAMPAIGNERS opposing a five-turbine wind farm in Rainworth considered trying to overturn its planning permission in the High Court.
Plans by energy giant Npower Renewables for the 125m-high wind turbines at Lindhurst Farm, off Blidworth Lane, were given the go ahead by Newark & Sherwood District Council last September.

But local residents believe the huge turbines will be too close to homes and have looked into getting a judicial review in the High Court in the hope of overturning the planning permission.

Campaigner Stuart Morris, from the Lindhurst Windfarm Action Group, told Chad the group had been in touch with solicitors — but had been unable afford the high costs of getting the case reviewed.

And Mansfield MP Alan Meale, who has backed the residents in opposing the plans, told Chad he did not understand why the proposed windfarm between Eakring and Bilsthorpe had been turned down, but the Rainworth one approved.

He said: "I think they have a right to seek a judicial review. The residents have had little other recourse to examine this. They have come to me for advice and help and I have given it.

"I am not against windfarms in general, but where this is going is totally inappropriate. It beggars belief that they have got huge areas at sea and non-residential areas and they plonk this on top of hundreds of houses."

But Cath Stevenson, development manager at Npower Renewables, told Chad this week the company could start building work next spring.

She said: "Site investigations are due to start over the coming weeks and, subject to discharging the planning conditions and securing wind turbines for the site, we expect to begin the construction process in spring 2009 at the earliest, though this may change depending on delivery timescales for the wind turbines.

"We will be issuing newsletters to residents when we begin in earnest to keep everyone up to date."

The full article contains 324 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 02 July 2008 3:11 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Mansfield
 
Prev
1
Next
1

James Bowlen,

Rainworth 04/07/2008 08:17:43
More power to their elbow - this unfair planning decision needs overturning.

Remember it was made by the Councillors from Newark and Sherwood (or more correctly from Newark - the Sherwood Councillors opposed it) as it was on land in the Newark and Sherwood area. It overlooks areas of Rainworth which came under the Mansfield District area - the residents of which have no democratic say as to the make-up of the NSDC or its Planning Committee (which again is grossly overloaded by Newark representatives. Alan Meale says that he cannot understand why the Eakring windfarm was turned down but the Rainworth one passed - Alan this is the reason - Newark has simply said "not in my back yard"
If the NSDC are so insistent that it has a windfarm on its land let it go to the East of the District where it does not affect the people of Rainworth - who seem to get everything dumped on them such as the windfarm, incinerator and the attempt to locate the Notts CC Roads Depot at the roundabout on the bypass!

2

Linda Tift,

Rainworth 04/07/2008 09:09:35
Lindhurst was accepted and Eakring rejected, I feel, on political grounds.After all why would any council want to spoil the romantic village image of North Notts and whether we like or not political bias and votes count. However, it is no better that Notts County Council signs a hugely expensive PFI contract for 25years equating to the most horrendous hire purchase agreement for taxpayers and yet with little or no consultation with those same taxpayers. Unfortunately, many people believe that these bodies are there to look after the public' interest but do not be deceived. Big business,in the pursuit of big profits, is the over riding influence I agree 'Not in my backyard. Until taxpayers and local communities start shouting the odds the public will continue to walked over. Come on middle England, join the revolution
3

JohnnyG,

Mansfield 04/07/2008 13:20:21
Wind turbines are something we are all going to have to get used to seeing. An energy resourse which does not pollute or use up stocks of oil, gas & coal seems like an excellent idea to me.
4

P Armitage,

Rainworth 04/07/2008 19:59:46
JohnnyG -

Whereabouts in Mansfield do you live? If you're in the east then the odds are that your skyline will be decorated by these giant windmills. If you're in the West can I ask that you put yourself in our place or volunteer to have some of these monstrosities near to your home. Prove you're not a NIMBY

Remember these are 125 metres high

That is about 575 feet in real money give or take a few inches!
and remember that there are FIVE of them planned - not just one!

These are to be put less than half a mile from our back doors. They will make a continual noise - day and night - and there will be a permanent annoying flicker from the vanes as they roll round catching the sun - when we get any!

Linda Tift is right!

It IS political and foisted onto us as we are near the edge of the Newark & Sherwood Council's area but we have no vote to dismiss those members of the planning Committee at Kelham Hall who won't see it. We are a Labour area and it is imposed on us by a set of Tory Councillors. It must be noted that the Eakring project which was rejected was in a Tory area with a Tory member defending a Tory seat - and if that's not pure politics nothing is!!

Can anyone help us with advice as to how we can get funding to force a judicial review on this scar on the landscape?



5

Jane W Morris,

Lindhurst 05/07/2008 22:44:59
We know that we have to get used to having wind turbines - whether they are actually efficient or not! The whole argument against the turbines here at Lindhurst is that they are going to be the biggest ever errected inland and the nearest ever to be built to a large housing conurbation. Rainworth is the largest village in Nottinghamshire the people who live there don't deserve to have this 'wind factory' dumped on their doorstep simply because it's tucked far enough away in Newark and Sherwood for it not to matter to their planning commitee!
We campaigned ceaselessly for over 2 years to try to get NPower to look at other sites within Newark and Sherwood District. The reason they wouldn't was because this particular site was offered to them by the farmer who owns the land it is due to be built on. WORK IT OUT - ITS ALL DOWN TO MONEY!!!
6

interested resident,

mansfield 12/07/2008 16:32:17
This planning application was completely democratic. All parties had opportunity to put their case, God knows it took long enough to reach a decision. Just because some people don't like the outcome is not good enough reason to seek a review.
P Armitage , you maths is a bit off, 125m = 408 feet not 575.
J Morris, wind turbines are not all about money. They are the simplest way for power companies to meet the renewable power obligations placed on them by Government. It would be even easier and cheaper if the same tired old nimby arguments weren't dragged out for every similar application across the country. You are right in that we will have to get used to them, let's start by embracing this one.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.