Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

available car
Low priced used cars at AvailableCAR supermarket.
 
 
Thursday, 2nd September 2010

Migrant workers exploited in King's Mill construction project

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 June 2008
Email Tom Pegg

EXPLOITED Eastern European migrants working on the £320m King's Mill Hospital regeneration project have taken home as little as £8.80 after a week's work, it has emerged today.
Construction union UCATT has unearthed what it has dubbed 'a case of appalling systematic abuse of vulnerable migrant workers' at the Sutton-in-Ashfield hospital.

The union has obtained pay slips which reveal some workers took home just £8.80 after working a 40 hour week.

UCATT chiefs say dry lining subcontracting company Produm paid 12 Lithuanian workers below the agreed minimum rates, did not pay overtime and charged excessive deductions for rent, tools and utility bills. It is understood that many of these charges were unlawful.

Employers are allowed to deduct a a maximum of £30.10 a week, or £4.30 a day - meaning an employee working 37 hours at £6 an hour should take home at least £174.14 a week unless they have agreed to any other deductions.

Said UCATT general secretary Alan Ritchie: "At UCATT we have been building up a large fact file of ganged workers. This case is the worst we have seen - these workers were virtually destitute. The fact it has occurred on a PFI site, using taxpayers' money is scandalous."

Subcontracted

It is understood that Skanska, the construction firm overseeing the project, had subcontracted the work to another firm, Baris, which had in turn subcontracted to Produm

It has also emerged that the workers had been ensured through a company, William DryWall, which was owned by the director of Produm and has since gone into receivership - meaning the workers were working without insurance protection.

Said a Skanska spokesman: "Since this information was brought to the attention of Skanska, the company has worked with UCATT to resolve these issues and Skanska has attended meetings to address the points raised so that any losses due to the relevant workers would be resolved.

"Skanska, for its part, has always had as its primary concern wanted to ensure that the individuals working on its site were paid in accordance with the National Working Rule Agreement."

UCATT only learned of the extent of the abuse after some of the workers had stopped being paid altogether with the company currently owing some workers five weeks' pay.

The workers were initially scared of approaching the union because Produm also provided the accommodation.

Mansfield MP Alan Meale this morning said he was 'appalled' at the situation and would be seeking meetings with Produm and UCATT.

"Law breaking like this will not be tolerated. They should not be flouting the law on minimum wage.

"Mansfield is not a third world economy and this type of thing should not be happening."

Skanska has insisted that the 'matters were resolved with the parties involved' on June 24.

But in a statement released this morning (Monday), UCATT has accused Baris of going back on an agreement to reimburse the workers so they received the correct level of pay.

Said UCATT regional secretary Steve Murphy: "This is a terrible indictment for the construction industry. This is a well-organised site where we are generally able to protect construction workers from exploitation. We will be able to eventually get a fair resolution for these workers.

"What is truly frightening is to think what happens on the many unorganised sites in our industry."

A spokesman for Sherwood Forest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, which runs King's Mill, said: "This is entirely a matter for Skanska and its appointed sub-contractors."

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 July 2008 9:37 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Mansfield
 
Prev
1
Next
1

The Source,

30/06/2008 09:53:33
"...meaning an employee working 37 hours at £6 an hour should take home at least £1174.14 a week..."

37 hours, £6 per hour, taking home £1174.14 A WEEK !
Where do I sign up for this?
2

The Source,

30/06/2008 09:57:21
Ah, I see you've spotted the mistake, nicely corrected.
£174.14 is more like it.
3

Dark_Storm,

30/06/2008 10:25:57
8)

I am not saying a word!!
4

infowars.com,

30/06/2008 10:57:52
Good idea, you only look like a retard when you do.. lmao
5

Meden Vale resident,

Mansfield 30/06/2008 20:59:11
how sad sub contract after sub contract
and they all making money out of these poor people
we might as well be in africa
so very sad
6

Dark_Storm,

02/07/2008 10:21:31
infowars your comment isn't worth spit go back to your site at somewherereal (check it out on google folks quite an eye opener) and stick to to your conspiracy theory nonsense.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.