Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Chad Careers and Jobs fair
Silver Award
Newspaper Society Weekly Website of the Year
 
 
Monday, 13th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Mansfield Chad site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Developer's plans for local gardens



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
14 May 2008
A COUNCILLOR has hit out at the planning system after developers applied to build houses in the garden of an elderly couple's Mansfield home without their consent.
District councillor Nick Bennett said it was wrong Hunt Habitats was able to apply to build 10 houses in back gardens between Southwell Road West and Clifton Grove without agreement of all the landowners.

One retired couple own part of the land th
e company wants to build on and have said they will not sell their garden — claiming the stress of the situation is making them ill.

And Coun Bennett told Chad he thought it was wrong that planning law allowed people to put in applications on land they did not own, while he also believes the plans would destroy wildlife habitats.

'Disgraceful'

"I think it is disgraceful that you can apply for planning permission on somebody else's land," he said. "These are older people and it has frightened them to death."

Householders objecting to the plans have collected a petition with more than 50 signatures and have now set up the Group Against Garden-Grabbing Development (GAGGD) to object to all similar developments.

And the elderly residents who live at the property told Chad they simply want the developer to 'leave them alone'.

They have asked Chad not to be named, but a woman living there said: "They are trying to take our land off us. Who wants to go down the garden and see a lot of houses? We wouldn't have any privacy.

"There would be no view at all. Some of them are going to be three storeys high. It has been stressful."

And her husband said: "We want them to leave us alone. To me it is hassle. It is not their property — it is ours. It has to be stopped."

But Matt Richardson, land director at Hunt Habitats, told Chad the company would continue to try to negotiate with the couple and would respect their wishes if they did not want to sell their land.

He said the company already owned 90 per cent of the proposed development land but if the couple would not sell up, they would build a smaller development of four or five houses.

"As a company, we decided it was time to talk to the planners," said Mr Richardson. "They wouldn't talk to us unless we spent money putting an application in.

"We are protecting our interests on the 90 per cent of land that we own. The planning policies do allow companies like ourselves to put forward planning applications on portions of land that we don't own.

"Whether we agree with that, we are just protecting out interests in getting a planning agreement in principle. A lot of companies up and down the country go for planning on land they don't own."

Anyone concerned about plans to develop on garden land can email gaggd2008@yahoo.co.uk.




The full article contains 490 words and appears in Mansfield Chad newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 15 May 2008 11:39 AM
  • Source: Mansfield Chad
  • Location: Mansfield
 
Prev
1
Next
1

infowars.com,

14/05/2008 10:19:51
Planning permission on other peoples property!!?? The corruption never ends does it..
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.