Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Chad Careers and Jobs fair
Silver Award
Newspaper Society Weekly Website of the Year
 
 
Monday, 8th September 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Was debate a 'Great Waste' of time?


What do you think? Sign in or register below to have your say.

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Email Jeremy Plews

MANSFIELD District Council ought to know by now that there is an inherent problem with surveys and questionnaires – few people take them seriously. As a result, response rates are invariably low and therefore largely meaningless.
The 'Great Waste Debate' launched by the Mayor, Tony Egginton, last November with the intention of getting the views of residents across the district on whether they wanted to see a return to weekly collections of household waste is a classic example
.

Fewer than 1,300 people bothered to complete the survey that was sent out to every household. Scarcely a representative sample from which to draw any conclusions, one might have thought.

Yet, from his reaction, the Mayor clearly sees the exercise as not only worthwhile, but a clear endorsement of the council's controversial fortnightly rubbish collection policy.

Perhaps he should not be surprised therefore if cynics see things rather differently. After all, wasn't the reinstatement of weekly bin collections during the summer months for the next four years one of his key pledges when seeking re-election last May (subsequently withdrawn because there was no money for it)?

And shouldn't he have appreciated when he made it that it was most unlikely there would be sufficient fundingt Not to mention finding himself on shaky ground when making the assertion that he would support the view put forward by the majority of residents who responded to his Great Waste Debate survey.

What do you think? Click below to have your say.




The full article contains 254 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 January 2008 9:42 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Mansfield
 
Prev
1
Next
1

bigspen,

mansfield 26/01/2008 11:30:40
I am from Pleasley and nobody i know received any kind of paperwork regarding this survey.I wonder how many other people were not given the chance to vote,and hoe convenient for the mayor that such a miniscule ammount of the local population voted.Everyone i know hates the fortnightly collections,especially in the summer time,and would the mayor like to comment on the plague of rats in the area.There is a minimum three month waiting list for the pest control officer to visit as he is so busy.
2

Dark_Storm,

26/01/2008 20:06:42
Once upon a time, somebody uttered the words. 'Have you ever had the feeling that you have been cheated?'
3

Bullfarm Bluesman,

Waste Farm. 27/01/2008 09:19:10
Talking of waste, what about the weekly CHAD vote? How many take part in this? Easy to vote, no need to go out the house, one question only and, apart from a quick snapshot of CHAD website users, meaningless.
However, nice to see the CHAD criticising the Mayor.
4

Dark_Storm,

27/01/2008 12:47:22
There should not had been a debate. He was voted in because he promised not to get rid of the weekly collection I recall.
5

Dark_Storm,

29/01/2008 08:13:13
The Great Waste Debate. As though anybody was going to fill in any forms towards the run up to Christmas and get them in the post and hand them into the local council office. Besides, this is a council that does not even know how many questionaires have been handed in for it's Decent Homes Program that is becoming more and more of a fiasco as it progresses along.

Online voting wouldn't work either because you can mask your i.p Bully.
6

Dark_Storm,

02/02/2008 13:50:09
How dare anyone utter the words 'sleaze' and 'political spin' in reply to the great waste debate.

There's more spin than Mayor Eggs Ferris Wheel on the defunct Market Place.
7

Dee Sent-Holmes,

03/02/2008 17:07:31
Old Bullfrog, you are a one. If you're not upsetting parents who shop at Asda you're slagging off the Chad.

I'm still wetting myself after your man boob 'non-story' clanger (what was it again - hospital and college were the big stories that week - yeah right!).

Meaningless Chad votes hey? But if they're so meaningless why have you summoned up the energy to comment on it. Taxi for bullfrog . . . yet again!
8

karlwass,

Mansfield 07/02/2008 00:13:11
Don't you tend to find that the people that moan are the ones that can't be bothered to fill in a form and post it though?

And the bins that have trouble with maggots, flies rats etc, are the ones where people buy/cook more food than they need therefore waste it and fill the bin with waste food. Or dont rinse recycled items as they should. We dont need a debate, we need to educate
9

Dark_Storm,

13/02/2008 20:23:08
Hmmm Today we learn that through shipping and that is including all that recycled waste, that the CO2 levels are 3 times higher than previously thought.

Do you honestly think that people need educating are people are not quite so silly to swallow every piece of propaganda
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.