Parking issue is not so clear-cut
What do you think? Sign in or register below to have your say.
Published Date:
16 January 2008
ASDA will no doubt receive plenty of support for its novel way of dealing with customers who abuse parking spaces reserved for the disabled and parents with young children.
The threat of a £60 fine (to be handed over to a charity) should go a long way towards stamping out the selfish, totally unacceptable behaviour that is all too common a sight.
The disabled have a hard enough time of it as it is without the added hassle of having to fight for parking places that are rightfully theirs.
However, the issue is not quite as clear-cut as it might seem. Even the genuine disabled who always use their badges properly agree there is widespread abuse of the system among badge-holders.
It can never be right for a member of a disabled person's family to use a badge or for it to be passed on to a third party.
This is an area of real concern that rankles with able-bodied motorists and genuine badge users alike.
The parent/toddler situation is not short on controversy either. There may be sound reasons for providing wider, reserved, parking bays for their use, but there will always be arguments about where they are sited and what age children have to be for the privilege not to be abused.
Parking at the highly popular Forest Town and Sutton branches of Asda (and most other superstores) can be trying enough at peak times. Which perhaps poses the question why they did not foresee the need for more parking provision at the outset, and ways to manage it better.
The full article contains 273 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
-
Last Updated:
15 January 2008 1:48 PM
-
Source:
n/a
-
Location:
Mansfield