Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Chad Careers and Jobs fair
Silver Award
Newspaper Society Weekly Website of the Year
 
 
Tuesday, 7th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Woodhouse drug dealer's appeal fails



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
17 April 2008
A MANSFIELD Woodhouse man who was jailed for selling crack cocaine to a user through his window has failed in an Appeal Court challenge to the conviction.
Jason Shetliffe (36), of Grove Street, launched an appeal after being locked up for six years at Derby Crown Court last May.

But he was told today by top judges at London's Criminal Appeal Court that the jury's verdict would stand and he will have to complete his sentence.

Shetliffe was arrested after police stopped a man riding a bike in Park Street, Mansfield Woodhouse, and found him carrying 0.14g of crack cocaine on 27th July 2006.

A police officer watching Shetliffe's home had earlier spotted the cyclist at the window of the property exchanging a small item with him.

The man was called to give evidence at the trial and said he had not bought the drugs from Shetliffe, but simply delivered a bottle of methadone through the window.

Following this piece of evidence at the trial, Shetliffe's barrister asked the judge to halt the case on the grounds that the prosecution should not be able to contradict its own witness and there was no case for Shetliffe to answer.

Refused

But the trial judge refused the submission, the jury was left to make up its own mind and Shetliffe was convicted.

On Thursday his barrister, Errol Ballentyne, argued that the judge had been wrong to refuse to stop the trial.

But dismissing the appeal, Mr Justice Hedley said there was enough evidence to put before the jury.

"It is perfectly true that the buyer did not at any stage say he was buying it from Shetliffe.

"But the fact of the matter was that the jury was entitled to consider that it would have been a considerable coincidence if the buyer had gone first to one address, tapped on the window and obtained drugs, and then done precisely the same thing on the second occasion but not obtained drugs.

"The whole of the second incident was seen by the police constable. His evidence was he had seen something handed by Shetliffe."

The full article contains 356 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 17 April 2008 5:27 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Mansfield
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Bermuda Viper,

18/04/2008 12:50:37
Good. About time.
Will he serve six years though or be let out in three?
They should be shot for the amount of ruin they cause in peoples lives. Not just the addicts but for the whole community with the knock on effects of crime which effect everyone else.
2

Anne O'raque,

18/04/2008 15:52:58
It's a madhouse in Woodhouse with the drugs though. There are regular raids in our area with certain bunch of scroats that have not yet been evicted and they are still dealing the filth,

They should be raided everyday 24/7 and their lives made a misery and not those around them. They get away with it. The only thing that they have done is move drugs from one property to another and it will take days for the police to serve a warrant and no doubt if and when a warrant is served the stuff will be gone.

If and when they are raided and stuff is found the stupid council will put them a new door on instead of evicting them as they should. They would sooner treat these people as being special cases rather than decent law abiding people that always get tread upon and their lives made hell with unwanted callers at their doors coming for their fixes.

Boot the door in and kick the scum out they are unfit for purpose. They are peddling this filth to children.
3

Ayup meduck,

21/04/2008 21:12:53
I agree 100% eliminating drugs should be the police's no 1 priority, the amount of crime directly connected to drug use is immense
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.