Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

available car
Low priced used cars at AvailableCAR supermarket.
 
 
Thursday, 2nd September 2010

£107,000 salary for new Ashfield Council chief

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
19 June 2009
ASHFIELD District Council's new chief executive is expected to receive a salary of up to £107,000, Chad can reveal.
The top job has been vacant since Alan Mellor retired due to ill health in October last year and the successful candidate will replace interim chief executive Philip Marshall.

Councillors agreed to advertise the post and increase the salary to make sure they attracted a wide range of candidates at a meeting on Friday.

Coun Gail Turner, an Independent councillor with the Independent-Conservative Alliance, told the meeting: "We need to be looking at people from outside this authority and hear what they have to say, which may include new and fresh ideas to drive Ashfield forward."

Her argument was echoed by Liberal Democrat Jason Zadrozny, who said there were around 245 senior council officials made redundant last year when some borough and district councils were dissolved.

He said: "I think there is somebody out there of a high calibre who can take Ashfield higher."

The council agreed to set a higher salary –– the previous pay was between £80,007 and £92,301 –– despite concerns raised by some members.

Said Coun Austin Rathe: "The Liberal Democrats will not support any increase in the grading of chief executive unless it is funded by a restructuring of the roles to realise these savings."

But Labour council leader John Knight dismissed the idea and said: "We are not going to change the structure in the next few weeks because we are talking about advertising it now.

"If we increase the band from £80,000 to £107,000 then we can go for the best candidate and see what they are paid."

The motion was carried by five votes to three.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 June 2009 5:04 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Mansfield
 
Prev
1
Next
1

robkirkstag,

sutton 24/06/2009 12:17:34
Thats ok, throw money around. We'll cover the bill for you.
Get real, there are loads of good people looking for jobs. Why pay through the nose until you've interviewed. If you pay enough you could hire Fred Goodwin. If you pay more you must get better people (not).
2

Welsh Beauty,

24/06/2009 12:27:35
oh dear, just another example of ashfield council chucking money away...£50k on sugababes and now this!!
3

Ashfields Voice Of Reason,

24/06/2009 12:30:45
Are we not getting mixed messages here from the Lib Dems, "Her argument was echoed by Liberal Democrat Jason Zadrozny, who said there were around 245 senior council officials made redundant last year when some borough and district councils were dissolved." followed by "Said Coun Austin Rathe: "The Liberal Democrats will not support any increase in the grading of chief executive unless it is funded by a restructuring of the roles to realise these savings."

Savings can be made very easily, simple scrap the County Council or the District Councils, then we will not have people doubling the money by sitting on both and do away with the dead wood who top up their pin money or pensions and don't give a damn about the people who pay these expenses.

What happened to the "Value for Money" concept that was mentioned, let's guess, it cost to much to sort.

Money for the boys and girls in the know, I think, they will know exactly who they want from their tea and cream scones meetings or swimming sessions in the Derbyshire Hotel. Am I better, Yes because the money can be better spent on things that really matter to the people of Ashfield.

It's said when we have 33 Councillors and only 8 make a decision on something so big.
4

woody225,

somewhere 24/06/2009 22:23:05
maybe i am talking out of turn here but lots of comments are being made without seeing the job spec. pity the reporter didn't print that for balance. i would think that this is a big job and not that many people can do it but if someone from ashfield can well i say great.
5

Mr Gummy,

Mansfield Metropolis 25/06/2009 13:15:43
You're not talking out of turn here Woody.

From what I can see, the headline is misleading. It should say 'potential £107,000 salary' given that the band stated runs from £80,000 to £107,000.

Whoever gets the job would most likely go in on a much lower pay than £107,000. They would only reach those dizzy heights once they'd been at the authority for a number of years, and if they've done a good job, then it'd be apt reward.

Well, not too apt. I'm a great believer in there being a £100k salary cap for local authorities but that's another argument.
6

London Stag,

London 25/06/2009 20:56:08
As a former ADC employee I feel I need to make a few comments here.

There should be no problem with paying that kind of salary for a man or woman who will head up an organisation with a turn over in excess of £20 million.

BUT

Anyone with an ounce of an understanding of how public services should be delivered will realise a new chief exec should review why there are so many inept chiefs at ADC. The problem is, the fools who are Heads of Service and assistant chief execs, (why an authority the size of Ashfield needs 2 assistants? But that’s a different story) are just the right side of bright enough not to appoint someone with the cahoonies to do it.

So as has happened with sickening regularity, post is advertised, “no suitable candidate could be found” then someone cherps up about succession planning and appoints a man (has anyone noticed how there are no senior female officers at ADC?) with no backbone and a brown tongue.

Thus the status quo of absolute mediocrity is preserved. I offer the case study of Paul Shackley head of Health and Housing as example.

Before any9one says its not the senior officers who appoint the new chief exec, let me say what happens on paper is very rarely replicated in what happens in practise. Who pulls the strings? It certainly aint the intellectually below par current Cabinet……..

7

ClareR,

26/06/2009 23:28:01
before i go a get my purse and hand the council more money i have a question.

if the councillors are saying that the current managers are good enough as they need to attract better by offering a higher salary, why dont they make some of those redundant to fund it?

oh and does it mean the interim CEO and the present heads of service are not good enough for the job? because if this is the case how can they be in a position to make decisions now?

maybe just maybe the financial mess the council is is down to the shoddy second rate management it seems to now be acknowledging it has? surely not, it would be funny if it wasnt so serious
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.